Upananda Brahmachari | HENB | New Delhi | Oct 24, 2015:: The communal Congress who paved the division of this country on Hindu-Muslim basis, on Friday called for a ban on the Shiv Sena after party Chief Uddhav Thackeray demanded that India be declared a ‘Hindu Rashtra’, saying that the comments are against the Constitution.
“India is a secular country and the Constitution is secular, and secularism can’t be changed here. Uddhav Thackeray’s comments are totally uncalled for as the comments are against the Constitution of the country. The election commission should take a cognizance of it, and should impose a ban on his party (Shiv Sena) immediately,” Congress leader Rashid Alvi told press here.
“If he has given a comment against the Constitution, then his party should be banned and I appeal the Prime Minister to look in this matter,” he added.
But, while some one from the press asked why not the ‘Secular’ was not included in the original preamble of the Indian constitution and it was only included in emergency period, the veteran Congress was seen hesitating to answer properly.
Shiv Sena Chief Thackeray on Thursday had said that the country should be declared a Hindu Rashtra, demanding an imposition of uniform civil code in the country. In his 45-minute speech he criticised Pakistan, Muslims and secularists. He further criticised the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on the issue of Ram Mandir and their ‘soft approach’ towards Pakistan.
As a matter of fact, Smt. Indira gandhi, the then Prime Minister, Indira Gandhi (her Islamic name was Maimuna Begum) proved her Islamic legacy by inserting the word, ‘Secular’ in the preamble of Indian constitution in 1976 (during the black days of emergency period) through 42th amendment. The makers of Indian constitution never thought any ‘Secular’ insertion in the original constitution of India. But humiliating the philosophy and guiding concept of constitution of India, Indira gandhi inserted two words in Constitution afterwards, Socialist (under the pressure of Communist and Russian lobby) and ‘Secular’ under her Islamic influence and to please the Islamic world as a permanent prevention of being a Hindu Rashtra in India, as she thought).
Padma Vibhushan Hirendranath Mukhopadhyay (Hiren Mukerjee), the veteran CPI leader and legend parliamentarian, told this writer over a decade back in a discussion (about his religious feelings and his views on Shyamaprasad Mookerjee) that “India got huge help from Russia and Congress ensured a backdrop Leftist support for introducing ‘Socialism’ in Indian constitution. On the other hand, Indira Gandhi wanted to won the ‘Arab and Islamic sentiment’ and also tried to derive her ‘personal gain’ by putting ‘Secularism’ in India as a nail to the coffin of Hindu Rashtra”.
When Prof. Mukerjee was asked about the nature of ‘personal gain’ from introducing ‘Secularism’ in Indian constitution by Smt Gandhi, he escaped the answer outrightly, but said, “Smt. Gandhi was an anti Hindu from her core of heart and once wanted to introduced beef in Parliament canteen as a mark of secularism”.
“Some Muslim parliamentarians urged secretly Smt Gandhi to introduced beef meal in Parliament canteen. Taking cognizance, Smt. Gandhi then started to knock the personal views of veteran non-Muslim MPs on this matter. When Indira asked me, I cautioned her not to do that”, Prof Mukherjee told this writer with a swift acessess of his evergreen memoirs of Indian Parliament.
In this context, it is very clear that the introduction of ‘Secular’ word in constitutional preamble by the Congress party was purely an anti-Hindu move led by then PM Indira Gandhi. It was not only an unethical move in the period of ‘Emergency’, it was made at the behest of Indira’s (Mimuna Begum) Islamic will.
Under a invariable turn of conspiracy, Congress did this ‘secular’ menace to Indian constitution with an amendment. So, indian people and their representatives have their rights to remove this black ‘secular’ spot from the holy constitution, through another amendment.
Moreover, the apex court also declared these two provisions, ‘Social’ and ‘secular’ of the 42nd Amendment, ‘unconstitutional’[see] which prevent any constitutional amendment from being “called in question in any Court on any ground” and accord precedence to the Directive Principles of State Policy over the Fundamental Rights of individuals respectively.
As many Congressi activities in emergency were challenged in courts and virtually discarded and denied, this 42 amendment of Indian constitution during emergency must be evicted as it amounts a bare contradiction of time, tune and space against the spirit of constitution itself.
The voice of Shiv Sena for a Hindu Rashtra in India is most justified and touches the One billion Hindus of this world, who have no Hindu state for them. On the basis of two nation theory, this nation was divided in two, Pakistan for Muslims and Hindusthan for Hindus. For the Congressi conspirators, Muslims got Pakistan, but Hindus got no Hindusthan for them. Pro Pak Congress digged another tunnel to invite another Pakistan through, ‘India. i.e. Bharat’!
There are 56 Islamic countries in this world, over 100 Christian countries, 12 Buddhist countries, even on Jews Coutry exists, then why not a Hindu State-Hindu rashtra in Bharat, i.e. India for one billion Hindus in this world.
Every Hindus must congratulate Uddhav Thackeray, the proud son of Hindu Icon Balasaheb Thackeray for his vision for Hindu rashtra in Bharat.
The Congressi demand for banning Shiv Sena is a rubbish. BJP in Central or any Congress run state have not the power to ban Shiv Sena.
In due course, BJP will have to take right steps to make India as a Hindu state constitutionally. This is good for India and BJP too to avert the Islamic havoc coming very fast in India. Agreeing the cause of an inevitable Hindu Rashtra in India is a permanent solution for Radical Islam and its barbaric Jihad in this perpetual land of 1 billion Hindus.
News source: PTI.