The Sanskrit word ‘tamas’ means ‘darkness’, and ‘tamoguna’ is ‘the quality of darkness or ignorance’. The Bhagavad Gita in Chapter 14 expands on this, and gives us the characteristics of a person who is tamasic. These include ‘ignorant’ and ‘delusory’.
At least as far back as 2004, and again in 2017 and 2018, the late Navaratna Srinivasa Rajaram proposed Maha-tamas, and not Mahatma, as the title appropriate for MK Gandhi. He translated this as “Great Ignoramus”.[1] One can add ‘Greatly Deluded’.
Over the years, many have shown that, yes, Gandhi was an ignoramus, deluded by his own ego of our civilisational essence, over-riding its dharmic strengths with his own mealy-mouthed vanities; deluded by his own ego of the realpolitik of the abrahamisms and the history of their rapacious political ideologies; deluded by his own ego of the divide-and-rule game in which the British missionary-colonials played him as their pawn; and deluded by his own ego into converting us to the negative passivity of his gandhigiri, away from the positive activity of chanakyaniti.[2]
There is the searing criticism by Sri Aurobindo and by Dr BR Ambedkar of the dishonesty central to the man. Ambedkar flatly denied Gandhi was in any way a mahatma and, through a biblical reference to evil, was optimistic that good would come out of Gandhi’s death.
After Gandhi’s death, there was the admission of Gandhi’s dishonesty by the very man Gandhi had foisted on our country as its first prime minister.
‘You know, he really was an awful old hypocrite.’[3]
Gandhi is the man we have been conditioned to believe got the British to leave us. They themselves say they left because of Netaji Bose. And they left cutting away a third of our matrbhumi from us, enabled to do so by Gandhi. We have been indoctrinated into parroting that Gandhi is the Father of the Nation. What ‘nation’? The ‘idea of India’ – a civilisational unity – predated him by millennia. And he broke in 1947 what was left of it. So, ‘father’ of what? Partition.[4]
Artfully constructed into a saint who redeems India, by anti-nationals to further their own anti-Hindu ambitions, we have a country still publicly worshipping this false god. Even the Supreme Court of India genuflects to him.[5]
There have been those who have been attempting to bring to light the enormous damage Gandhi has wrought to the Hindu psyche and the Hindu rashtra, and that gandhigiri – a euphemism for Gandhian hypocrisy – still wreaks on us through its cunning employment and manipulation by the abrahamists and their fellow-travellers in our country.[6]
All these bedfellows erupted out of the woodwork in December 2019 with their well-prepared violent agitation after the Citizenship Amendment Act provided succour to those non-Muslims who’d been persecuted in three neighbouring Islamic States. They agitated not because any Indian Muslim citizen was affected – they knew they weren’t – but because Pakistan and Bangladesh Muslims illegally in India would be affected. And so, behind pictures of Gandhi, they rioted murderously against and koranically killed Hindus to demand non-Muslim refugees should be excluded too, or all Muslim aliens be included.[7]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
The Messenger of Allah, who is the founder of Islam, sanctioned the ghazwa-e-hind. The mullahs and their ilk of the subcontintental ummah in no uncertain terms reveal this their eventual aim.[8]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
Every Muslim, by koranic definition, has the Allah-ordained duty to be a ghazi, an infidel-slayer.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
It is the sacred duty of every ghazi to convert India to a darul islam, in other words, to convert – or kill – us Hindus.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
So, it is islamically acceptable that Muslim men brainwash Muslim women and children into being suicide bombers.
It is islamically acceptable that Muslim men manoeuvre Muslim women and children in front of them to be human shields,
The death, in the ghazwa cause, of a Muslim by a Muslim is islamically acceptable by their hukm al-tatarrus (the law of using human shields).
Adapt the islamic ritual of ramy al-jamarāt (the stoning of the devil) to the Indian context, and you can see why it is the Muslim practice of first resort – even by their women and children – to pelt stones at Hindus as companions of the devil.
It is islamically acceptable for Muslims in India to practise an envenoming pedophrasty, and – without guilt or shame – laud as a martyr a Muslim baby for whose death they were responsible.
It took a child to write to the Supreme Court to recognise this as violative of ‘child rights and natural justice’. Months later, there is no report that the Supreme Court agitated itself into a decision against it.
It is islamically acceptable for Muslims to pray, to loud and enthusiastic congregational acclaim, for the death of 50,00,00,000 Indians.
It is islamically acceptable for Muslims from all over our country and the world to knowingly organise themselves at their world headquarters in Delhi and then wilfully to fan out all over India to act as vectors of a pandemic.
It is islamically acceptable, when stones, ballistas and petrol-bombs are not available to them, for Muslims to use as bioweapons their sputum, urine, and faeces – yes, their spit, piss and shit.
It is islamically acceptable for these ghazis – whose mission their mullahs say is to live like the founder of their religion – to expose their genitals and behave lewdly with nurses, and to spit on doctors and stone them and ambulances.[9]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
Their god will feed and protect them, their god tests their loyalty to him by their readiness to sacrifice their own for him, so they are ready to die, and kill their children too, for their god, towards their god’s doom to us kafirs.
They say this themselves.
A third of the identified pandemic cases in India were traceable to these bioterrorists, before transmission spread widely. ‘Secular’ political correctness required they be whitewashed as a ‘single source super-spreader’.[10]
Make no mistake. What is going on are battles in the war sanctioned by the Founder of Islam himself, and the ghazis understand well that ‘the fight is long’.
Let it be noted that bioterrorism to further in India the COVID-19 pandemic emerged as part of their ghazwa arsenal. Their bioterrorism is theologically acceptable, declared so by their mullahs, and consciously engaged in by them. They do so, explicitly identifying themselves and the pandemic with their god. Their god and their own ‘holy’ book explicitly sanction our persecution and our death as ‘the worst of created beings’.
And such ‘unreason’ – the pandemic, and its consequences on us, as an act of their god – would have had Gandhi’s full approval.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
The ghazwa strategy – furthered by its useful idiots – includes projecting ghazis as victims, and mullahs tactically retreating from responsibility when required by damage control (taqiyya).
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
Gandhi would have approved.
‘He has never called the Muslims to account even when they have been guilty of gross crimes against Hindus…..Not only have the Musalmans not condemned these outrages but even Mr. Gandhi has never called upon the leading Muslims to condemn them. He has kept silent over them’, noted Ambedkar.
The ghazis themselves flaunt their islamiyat. Yet for kafirs to point that out and to hold these ghazis to public account is branded ‘islamophobia’.
Gandhi would have approved.
‘This attitude to excuse the Muslims any wrong, lest it should injure the cause of unity, is well illustrated by what Mr. Gandhi had to say in the matter of the Mopla riots’, noted Ambedkar again.[11]
The poster boy for the February 2020 anti-Hindu killings is their pistol-wielding gangster Mohammad Shahrukh.
The international poster boy for the bioterrorists in India is the madrassa-trained Maulana Saad Kandhlawi of the Tablighi Jamaat.[12]
Hindu incomprehension of the ghazwa-e-hind, of the asuric nature of the monotheisms, of a minority-appeasing political executive, of a compliant bureaucracy, and of a negationist judiciary wittingly turning a blind eye to them are suicidal for us.[13]
The ghazis fight islamically. By hook or by crook, no holds barred.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
Hindus are hamstrung with the Supreme Court’s homilies on ‘Constitutional morality’, even as the Supreme Court reveals its own helplessness in dealing with these ghazis.
Hindus are hamstrung because of a polity and its Constitution still haunted by the ghost of Gandhi.
If India is to delude itself with the myth of sarvadharma samabhava, then it is for Islam to recognise Hinduism as equal. This, by its own self-definition, it cannot. Gandhigiri keeps the Hindu a ‘bali ka bakra’ – sacrificial goat – bleating the equality of religions, while the butchers sharpen their knives (or, as they did in February 2020, use rooftop ballistas and petrol bombs and acid missiles against Hindus).
Butchers understand best only the language of butchers. Know that the lex talionis (qisas) is sanctioned by the Koran.
And, no, Gandhi did not say that an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind.
That is another Gandhi myth peddled by abrahamic predators to gull Hindus into lying back and enjoy being preyed upon, as he wanted us to, ‘like a cow into the mouth of a tiger to appease his hunger’.[14]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
In support of and with these ghazis, Hindu quislings are useful idiots waving pictures of Gandhi as their inspiration, seeking to facilitate Gandhi’s delusion of a khudai raj over India.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
This is Gandhi –
‘There is no doubt in my mind that in the majority of quarrels the Hindus come out second best. My own experience but confirms the opinion that the Musalman as a rule is a bully, and the Hindu as rule is a coward. I have noticed this in railway trains, on public roads, and in the quarrels which I have had the privilege of settling. Need the Hindu blame the Musalman for his cowardice?’
‘Where there are fools there are bound to be knaves, where there are cowards there are bound to be bullies…..The question here therefore is not how to teach one of the two communities a lesson or how to humanise it, but how to teach a coward to be brave…..Cowardice should [have] no place in the national dictionary.’
‘Quarrels must break out so long as the Hindus continue to be seized with fear. Bullies are always to be found where there are cowards. The Hindus must understand no one can afford them protection if they go on hugging fear.
Running away for fear of death, leaving one’s dear ones, temples or music to take care of themselves, is irreligion; it is cowardice. It is not manly, it is unmanly. Non-violence is the virtue of the manly. The coward is innocent of it.’
So how is the Hindu coward to be taught to be brave?
By surrendering non-violently to Muslim violence – ‘to face death cheerfully if the Muslims are out to kill them’ – and how is this tamasic prescription different from that of a sick mind that instructs ‘when rape is inevitable, lie back and enjoy it’?
‘Hindus should never be angry against the Muslims even if the latter might make up their minds to undo even their existence.’
‘They should not be afraid of death. After all, the killers will be none other than our Muslim brothers.’
‘He appealed to the Hindus and the Sikhs [during Partition] not to retaliate. He dared say that even if all Hindus and Sikhs died without retaliation at the hands of their Muslim brethren they would save not only Hinduism and Sikhism but also serve Islam and save the world. He had already offered a plan to the Hindus. He wanted them to fall victims to the knives of the Muslims like a cow into the mouth of a tiger to appease his hunger.’
‘I would tell the Hindus to face death cheerfully if the Muslims are out to kill them….You may turn round and ask whether all Hindus and all Sikhs should die. Yes, I would say…’
`Mahatma Gandhi taught Hindus to “settle quarrels by dying, but not by killing”… It is significant, though, that Gandhi expected this only of Hindus.
Ambedkar recorded that ‘the blood-curdling atrocities committed by the Moplas in Malabar against the Hindus were indescribable……[Gandhi] was prepared to make light of the doings of the Moplas…..He spoke of the Moplas as the “brave God-fearing Moplas who were fighting for what they consider as religion and in a manner which they consider as religious”.’
Gandhi ‘was delighted to be told that there were Hindus who did prefer the Moplah hatchet to forced conversion…… Even so is it more necessary for a Hindu to love the Moplah and the Mussulman more, when the latter is likely to injure him or has already injured him’.
He wanted that ‘Hindus in their lakhs offered themselves to be cut to pieces without retaliation or anger in their hearts’.
‘If every Hindu in East Bengal had been done to death, I would not have minded it.’ He wanted Hindus to ‘say firmly that whatever happened they would not fight’.
‘I do not mind if each and every one of the 500 [Hindu] families in your area is done to death.’
On 6 August 1947, Gandhiji commented to Congress workers on the incipient communal conflagration in Lahore thus: “I am grieved to learn that people are running away from the West Punjab and I am told that Lahore is being evacuated by the non-Muslims. I must say that this is what it should not be. If you think Lahore is dead or is dying, do not run away from it, but die with what you think is the dying Lahore.
And that’s just a sample.
Gandhi is the prime example of his own opinion that the Hindu is a coward. He grovelled before Muslim bullying, he preached cowardice to Hindus, and he ensured a polity to perpetuate our dhimmitude.
‘I would be ruled by them [Muslims]…..Let no one commit the mistake of thinking that Ramarajya means a rule of the Hindus. My Rama is another name for Khuda…..I want Khudai raj…..The rule of the first four Caliphs was somewhat comparable to it’, said Gandhi.[15]
So – Gandhi or ghazi – for us kafirs, where is the difference?
Gandhi invited Hindus, he wanted Hindus, he told Hindus to die. He was delighted when Hindus died from Muslim violence. Not to face it, not to repel it, but to welcome it and its consequence – death for Hindus. Never, but never, did he wish death for Muslims.
Hindu lives don’t matter.
Gandhi would have agreed with the ghazis that the COVID-19 pandemic is Allah’s punishment to us kafirs for our insufficient appeasement of Muslims. Just as he justified the Mopla massacre of Hindus because the Hindus had not cared enough for the Moplas.
Again, Gandhi or ghazi – for us kafirs, where is the difference?
See it as a pincer. One jaw of the pincer is the ghazwa-e-hind, the other jaw of the pincer is khudai raj, holding the pincer is Gandhi, and being cut by it are we Hindus.
Gandhi was explicit about the cutting of Hindus by Muslims.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
Recall that nowhere, but nowhere, in the world where Islam and Christianity have conquered, have they allowed significant pagan populations to survive. Nowhere in the territories of these two monotheisms is there a meaningful survival of any pre-monotheism, any paganism. There is not one significant exception to this worldwide historical fact.
And ghazis understand this and they act against us adapting the principles of the koranic concept of war. We react by our Supreme Court preaching ‘Constitutional morality’ to us.[16]
To survive, it is we who need to understand The Golden Rule of Reciprocity, to which I add my Rider of the Pre-emptive Strike – Do to others as you would have them do unto you – but if you have sufficient experience of what they’ll do unto you, you do it to them first.
Because Hindu lives matter.
We need to familiarise ourselves with and learn from the experience of a numerically much fewer people that has managed to survive a 2000-year annihilatory persecution by Islam and Christianity. We need to learn from the Jews and Israel.
Because Hindu lives matter.
We need to remind ourselves of the lesson of Srikrishna to Arjuna:
mAyAvinam ch rAjAnam mAyayaiva nikruntatu – to those who deceive, respond with deception.
Recall how Bhima manouevred the death of Kichaka. Recall how, in the cause of dharma, Srikrishna strategised the elimination of Jayadratha and his father Vridhakshatra, Jarasandha, Bhishma, Dronacharya, Karna, and Duryodhana.
Gandhigiri has made us forget the lesson Srikrishna taught our ancestors.
We need to re-learn chanakyaniti.
Because Hindu lives matter.
If we are to do this Constitutionally, then first we need to remove those provisions in the Constitution of India that intentionally discriminate against Hindus.[17]
For the monotheists and their international sponsors and intranational lickspittles, we Hindus are turds, yes, turds. And from ‘fecal matter’ too was made at least one of our gods – the enormously-popular one invoked as the remover of obstacles. Therefore, we Hindus – and the remover of our obstacles – are to be flushed away, to be expelled – and the monotheists make an explicitly Gandhi connection to this removal.[18]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
So you can see why the United Nations chief, an abrahamist, wants the return of the Gandhian spirit.
And you can see why his High Commissioner for Human Rights, another abrahamist, agitates herself for Muslims, and not for those whom Muslims persecute.
And you can see why his Under-Secretary-General and Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide, still another abrahamist, does likewise.[19]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
They want Gandhi’s ‘final solution’ for us. As Gandhi himself did – he was directly responsible for the Partition of 1947 when he, leading the useful idiots of the time, surrendered to the ghazis. His wilfully blind ignorance of the Koran and the reality of Islamic rule over India (which Ambedkar realised) had him proclaiming delusively that ‘my whole soul rebels against the idea that Hinduism and Islam represent two antagonistic cultures and doctrines’, and he vaingloriously boasted that ‘if the Congress wishes to accept partition, it will be over my dead body. So long as I am alive, I will never agree to the partition of India.’[20]
Partition happened, and Nehru was dead right about that awful old hypocrite. Partition happened not over the hypocrite’s dead body but over the dead bodies of perhaps a million kafirs whom he sacrificed to the ghazwa, together with one-third of what remained of our matrbhumi. From that third the ghazis have all but eliminated the kafirs – even islamically bulldozing their homes and starving them during the pandemic, while the UN chief lauds the ‘Islamic tradition of hospitality and generosity’.[21]
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
The halo conferred on Gandhi is black with the blood of those who died in consequence of his hypocrisy, and his corrosive legacy still fosters the ghazwa-e-hind in the remaining two-thirds of our matrbhumi.[22]
We need re-learn our indigenous tradition in statecraft, and analyse nation and nationhood through an exegesis of chanakyaniti. If we are to be powerful, to survive in the world, we must learn from our own traditions.[23] We need to recognise that which is right under our noses but about which we choose not to speak nor even see even though it is all in the public domain.
Mahatamas. Not Mahatma. Gandhi deluded himself, and we still delude ourselves with a mythology that sanctifies him.
Because Hindu lives don’t matter.
Remember what Nehru said of Gandhi –
‘You know, he really was an awful old hypocrite.’
Here is Gandhi again –
Anybody, if he so desires, can publicly oppose my work. That in fact is his right; it may even be his duty. Therefore, whosoever wishes to do anything or say anything, let him do so fearlessly.[24]
And this is just what we need to do. De-hagiolise the man, and establish very clearly that MK Gandhi was not a Great Soul at all.
Because Hindu Lives Matter
Source: Krishen Kak WordPress