The History of Conspiracy against Hinduism
By Dirgha Raj Prasai
Esha Deol
Two Hundred years ago, the greatKing Prithvi Narayan Shah expressed –”Nepal is true Hindustan”when India (present Hindustan) was not in existence, where there were more than 25 nations in India. The creator- Prithvi Narayan Shah had unified more than 54 small fiefdoms to build a large, expanded and strong Nepal. The British Empire, spreading in Asia, after getting hold of its influence in India had eyed on mountainous region of Nepal. At that time, it was not an easy task to fight British imperialistic force in the mid 18th century. Prithvi Narayan Shah, the great King, fought and won the British forces and saved the National sovereignty and Hindu identity. But, now Nepal is in danger position.Nepalese all around the world and Nepal’s well-wishers are anxious about the conspiracy designed by some deviant party leaders (agents of RAW and CIA), against the Monarchy and Hinduism.
The Gayatri Mantra is a highly revered mantra in Hinduism- is applied from Baidik period which is written in Sanskrit:
‘Om ! Bhur Bhuvah Svah ! Tat Savitur VarenyamBhargo Devasya Dheemahi Dhiyo Yo Nah Prachodayaata’= ‘Let us meditate upon the glory of Ishwar, Who has created this Universe, Who is fit to be worshipped, Who is the remover of all sins and ignorance. May He enlighten our intellect?’Ms,Esha Deol has contributed showing Gayatri Mantra on her body.
Since 2005, in the name of Secularism, the foreigners specially- RAW & CIA are active in Nepal to abolish the Hindus identity for Christianity. Some leaders of Congress, UML, Maoist, these self-serving secularists– agents of foreigners, refuse to see that Theocracy is alive and well internationally. Just look at all the Islamic states, Israel, as well as many European states that proclaim them secular but practice hard-core evangelical proselytizing Christianity. So what was wrong with Nepal being the sole Hindu state in the world? ‘OM’ is a symbol of Vedic Knowledge- Hindus, Buddhist’s Mantra. It provides a fine example of Symbolism. Symbolism is needed in all fields of human knowledge like science, religion and politics. Spoken sounds of words are expressed as Alphabets and Numbers with Symbols by writing. ‘OM’ and ‘OM Mani Padme Hum’ is a language of Sanskrit.
About 950 years ago the Muslims invaded India. Their aim was to conquer, convert, destroy and loot. Due to their notorious attacking they were successful. At that time Muslims burned many Hindus- temples and erected mosques on top of the burned out temples and on other locations also. In the ruling time of Muslim in India, English imperialist-East India Company invaded India with Christianity. They came first as traders, secondly-Bible and third was sword where they were building their own military force, secretly, to take over India and they were getting help from Great Britain to do so, and they succeeded. The British bribed the military by paying salaries to fight for them, to control Muslims. Many Sikhs, Indians joined the British military and betrayed Hindus-(Bhagavaandaas Tyaagi)
Hindus have always opened their hearts to all faiths across the globe, protected them, sheltered them, nourished them, never abused them, never terrorized them, and only allowed them total freedom to practice their faith without demeaning them, terrorizing them, destroying their places of worship and forcing them to convert. If we want to know the historical facts of invade by Muslims and Christians we should understand the reality and its pre-historical accounts.
In 1520 the Muslim ruler Baber came, plundered, ruined, and demolished Rama Temple and built Babri Masjid using the demolished debris. The events of December 6, 1992Hindus attacked the Babri Masjid, they were only taking over their sacred place and thousands of history. No nation can afford to ignore the history. History of mankind has not started on 1528. Among the excavation yields ASI mentioned were stone and decorated bricks, mutilated sculpture of divine couple, carved architectural members including foliage patterns, amalaka, kapotapali, doorjamb with semi-circular shrine pilaster, broken octagonal shaft of black schist pillar, lotus motif, circular shrine having pranjala (watershute) in the north and 50 pillar bases in association with a huge structure. This should give some idea of the magnitude of the distortion involved in turning Babar into a tolerant person, let alone a prince charming. And when in a particularly happy mood, he composed the following dirge: ‘For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer; I battled infidels and Hindus. I determined to become a martyr Thank God I became a holy warrior.’http://savetemples.org
Sudhir-Architect has posted- (in shirt)In 1528 A.D. Babar came to Ayodhya and he destroyed the ancient temple and on its site built a mosque, still
known as Babar’s mosque. The materials of the old structure [i.e., the temple]
were largely employed, and many of the columns were in good preservation.” Guru Nanak. He was a contemporary of
Babar, and an eyewitness to his vandalism. Nanak condemned him in the strongest
terms. The historian Harsh Narain in his book The Ayodhya Temple Mosque Dispute: Focus on Muslim Sources, writes: “Guru Nanak, according to Bhai Man Singh’s Pothi Janam Sakhi, said to have been composed in 1787 Anno Vikrami/1730 A.D., visited Ayodhya and said to his Muslim disciple Mardana: ‘Mardania! eh Ajudhia nagari Sri Ramachandraji ki hai. So,chal, iska darsan kari’e. Translation:
‘Mardana! This Ayodhya city belongs to Sri Ramachandra Ji. So let us have its
darsana.'”
This indicates that Nanak visited Ayodhya shortly before the destruction of the Rama temple by Babar. Another work by Baba Sukhbasi Ram gives a similar account, again suggesting that Nanak visited Ayodyha before the temple was destroyed by his contemporary, the Mughal invader Babar.
Muslim sources also give a similar account. After the destruction of Babar’s mosque the excavation report said- ‘These pits gave away two-thousand year
old molded bricks and ornate stone pieces of different shapes and sizes. The
news item dishonored these facts. Beautiful stone pieces bearing carved Hindu ornamentations like lotus, Kaustubh jewel, alligator facade, etc., have been used in these walls. These decorated architectural pieces have been anchored with precision at varied places in the walls. A tiny portion of a stone slab is sticking out at a place below 20 feet in one of the pits. The rest of the slab lies covered in the wall. The projecting portion bears a five-letter Dev Nagari inscription that turns out to be a Hindu name. The items found below 20 feet should be at least 1,500 years old. According to archaeologists about a foot of loam layer gathers on topsoil every hundred years. Primary clay was not found even up to a depth of 30 feet. It provides the clue to the existence of some structure or the other at that place during the last 2,500 years. Please read- detail-http://www.hvk.org/specialarts/safa/safa.html
In 1992, we all Hindus in the world were disturbing about the confusion of Ram Janambhumi of Ayodhya, but at 30 Sep-2010, UP- High Court’s verdict and the unambiguous decision that the Ram Janma Bhumi Mandir site is indeed the birth place of Lord Ram and indeed a Hindu temple has existed there from time immemorial.
Similarly, the Taj Mahal was a pre-existing structure before but it was said to be built by Shah Jahan. We have all heard how the Taj Mahal, which is considered one of the great wonders of the world, was built as the preeminent expression of a man’s love for a wife. That it was built by Emperor Shah Jahan in commemoration of his wife Mumtaz. But the truth is that the Taj Mahal was never built by Shah Jahan. Some say the Taj Mahal pre-dates Shah Jahan by several centuries and was originally built as a Hindu or Vedic temple/palace complex-known as-‘Tejomahalaya’(powerfull Siva),the Hindu King Jai Singh. This is not unlike the many other buildings that were acquired by the Muslim invaders to be used for their own purposes. The point to consider is how much more of India’s history has been distorted if the background of such a grand building is so inaccurate. The evidence that shows the Taj Mahal and many other buildings may not have been of Muslim origin.
‘The architecture is definitely of Hindu orientation and could very well have been designed as a Shiva temple; the issue of the arch and the dome; how the invader Timurlung (1398) took back thousands of prisoner craftsmen to build his capital at Samarkhand and where the dome could have been incorporated into Islamic architecture; how it was not Shah Jahan’s religious tolerance that could have been a reason for Hindu elements in the design of the Taj.’- Stephen Knapp, www.stephen-knapp.com I think- the automatic falling the droops of water managed for the Lord Shiva who converted after for the queen Shah Jahan’s body.
Similarly, the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb (1658-1707) topped the list. One of the main objectives of Aurangzeb’s policy was to demolish Hindu temples. This was followed by Aurangzeb’s order to demolish the highly venerated temple of Vishwanath at Banaras (Jan.-Feb. 1670) Aurangzeb’s zeal for temple destruction became much more intense during war conditions. The opportunity to earn religious merit by demolishing hundreds of temples soon came to him in 1679. In June 1681, orders, in a laconic two-liner, were given for the demolition of the highly venerated Jagannath Temple in Orissa (Exhibit No. 24, Akhbarat, 1st June 1681). Shortly afterwards, in September 1682, the famous Bindu-Madhav temple in Banaras was also demolished as per the Emperor’s orders (Exhibit No. 27, Akhbarat, Julus 26, Ramzan 20). On 1st September 1681, while proceeding to the Deccan, where his rebel son Prince Akbar, escorted by Durga Das Rathore, had joined Chhatrapati Shivaji’s son, Shambhaji, thus creating a serious problem for him, Aurangzeb ordered that all the temples on the way should be destroyed. The number of such ruthless acts of Aurangzeb makes a long list but here only a few have been mentioned. In obedience to the Quranic injunction, he re-imposed Jizyah on the Hindus on 2nd April 1679 (Exhibit No. 16), which had been abolished by Emperor Akbar in 1564, causing widespread anger and resentment among the Hindus of the country. A massive peaceful demonstration against this tax in Delhi, was ruthlessly crushed. His death after a long and ruinous reign lasting half a century ended an eventful epoch in the history of India. He left behind a crumbling empire, a corrupt and inefficient administration, a demoralized army, a discredited government facing public bankruptcy and alienated subjects. http://www.aurangzeb.info/
The number of temples destroyed under his orders is counted in four figures. Aurangzeb ordered all temples destroyed such as the Kashi Vishvanath that was one of the most sacred temples and a center of Hindu learning who had built by the first Lichavi King- Bikramaditya. The Mughal Emperor had mosques built on a number of cleared temples sites. All other Hindu sacred places within his reach also suffered destruction and mosques were built upon them. Then, Pratap Malla (Malla king of Nepal) built a temple of lord Shiv at Rani Pokhari- Kathmandu and wrote a lyric that Vishvanath is in here.’- (Chand Kumar Sharma). So, we request to all Hindu nationalists in the world including Nepalese and Indian people and party leaders not to minimize the reality of Hinduism and Buddhism, the basis of world civilization. We should be conscious to save the sovereign-identity of Hinduism.
Email: dirgharajprasai@gmail.com
Dirgha Raj Prasai is a political and cultural analyst based in Kathmandu, Nepal. He is former member of parliamnet, Nepal.
Source: Dirgha Raj Prasai Via. publisher@worldhindunews.com
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. World Hindu News is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this article. All information is provided on an as-is basis. The information, facts or opinions appearing in the article do not reflect the views of World Hindu News and World Hindu News does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.